Thermafiber's new UltraBatt mineral wool insulation is distributed nationally through Menards
The company is the world’s best Rockwool panels for insulating shipping containers supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.
Photo: Thermafiber I recently reported that a new mineral wool insulation product from Roxul can be readily used in place of foam-plastic insulation materials like polystyrene in certain applications. As part of our ongoing research into how builders and designers can make better insulation choices (see our full webcast and report on the topic), I have new mineral wool developments to report.First, a little background: mineral wool, variously referred to as rockwool, slagwool, and stone wool, was one of the first insulation materials to be widely produced commercially&#;starting back in in Germany.
Rockwool International, the world&#;s largest producer of mineral wool and the parent company of Canadian manufacturer Roxul, began production of the material in . The U.S. company Thermafiber, one of the largest U.S. producers of the material and a company poised for rapid growth today, was founded in .
Mineral wool is made by melting the raw material, which can be stone (such as basalt) or iron ore slag, at very high temperature, spinning it like cotton candy to produce very thin fibers, coating those fibers with a binder to hold them together, and forming it into the insulation batt or boardstock material to meet specific product needs.
Mineral wool lost most of its market share when less-expensive fiberglass insulation came along, but unique properties of the material have been fueling a comeback in recent years&#;and this year the world&#;s largest fiberglass insulation company, Owens Corning, purchased Thermafiber. With this development, I&#;m expecting to see a lot of attention paid to mineral wool in the coming years&#;led by a new product introduction last week.
BuildingGreen relies on our premium members, not on advertisers. Help make our work possible.
See membership options »Mineral wool is highly fire resistant, which has long made it an insulation material of choice in many commercial buildings. It achieves its fire resistance without the use of any flame retardant chemicals, which are widely used in most foam-plastic insulation materials&#;and which I believe to be a huge downside of those products.
Mineral wool is a heavier and more dense insulation material that fiberglass, giving it better sound-control properties and more effectively restricting air movement through it. When produced in boardstock form, mineral wool can be rigid enough to work as insulative sheathing, like extruded polystyrene and polyisocyanurate.
Mineral wool can also contain very high recycled content by using iron ore slag (a waste product from steel manufacturing). Some mineral wool products on the market have over 90% recycled content&#;higher even than cellulose insulation, though it is made from pre-consumer rather than post-consumer recycled material.
There are three major downsides to mineral wool. One is that mineral fibers can break off and become airborne; when we breathe those fibers in they can cause health problems. In the past there was some concern that mineral wool and fiberglass fibers might be carcinogenic, like asbestos. While those concerns have largely been dismissed, the fibers are still respiratory irritants. Installers of mineral wool should always wear quality dust masks, and the material should be adequately covered with drywall or coatings that prevent fibers from entering the indoor air in a building.
The second downside is the binder used to glue the fibers together. Manufacturers use a phenol formaldehyde or a urea-extended phenol formaldehyde binder. Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen, and if a lot of it escapes into the indoor air, that would clearly be a health concern. Fortunately, the processing drives off nearly all of the free formaldehyde in the material, so formaldehyde emissions from mineral wool have extremely low formaldehyde levels&#;in some cases as low as background formaldehyde levels.
Nonetheless, there is a perception problem with formaldehyde binders&#;if not a real problem&#;and manufacturers are working on alternatives&#;as has occurred with fiberglass insulation. I fully expect that within a few years one of the mineral wool manufacturers will announce a biobased binder that works with mineral wool and the industry will fairly quickly convert to such a binder.
The third downside to mineral wool is that it can be hard to work with. Mineral wool boardstock is more compressible than rigid foam-plastic insulation, so installing strapping over it may take special care. In the batt form, the insulation doesn&#;t compress as easily as fiberglass to squeeze into odd corners and around wires. That can make mineral wool harder to work with&#;but it should also prevent some of the worst installation problems that occur with fiberglass. (The effectiveness of all types of batt insulation depends to a very significant extent on the care taken during installation.)
For more information, please visit PUR Decorative Panel.
UltraBatt is an unfaced mineral wool insulation that offers very good fire resistance and sound control.
Photo: Thermafiber The latest news with mineral wool is the introduction by Thermafiber (now an Owens Corning company) of UltraBatt, a flexible batt insulation product for 2x4 or 2x6 walls. This follows Roxul&#;s introduction of a widely distributed mineral wool batt insulation product, ComfortBatt, several years ago.UltraBatt is a fairly dense batt (not compressible like fiberglass batts) that offers very good sound control as well as relatively high insulating values. The 3-1/2&#; batts for 2x4 walls provide R-15, and the 5-1/2&#; batts for 2x6 walls provide R-23&#;though, as with all cavity-fill insulation, that actual &#;whole-wall&#; R-value will be lower, due to thermal bridging through the studs.
UltraBatt is comprised of 70% post-industrial recycled content. As for pricing, the national distributor Menards showed the online price to be about $31 per 40 square feet in the 3-1/2&#; batts, or about $0.77 per square foot. This compares with unfaced CertainTeed fiberglass batts at about $23 for 88 square feet, or $0.26 per square foot. The installed cost of dense-pack cellulose, meanwhile, is typically $1-2 per square foot for a 2x4 wall, though the pricing of any contractor-installed insulation is very dependent on the project.
I have not seen test data on formaldehyde (or other) emissions from UltraBatt, but I was told by Owens Corning that testing is underway and findings will be reported in . I suspect that, like Roxul&#;s ComfortBatt, the formaldehyde emissions will be very low.
Alex is founder of BuildingGreen, Inc. and executive editor of Environmental Building News. In he founded the Resilient Design Institute. To keep up with Alex&#;s latest articles and musings, you can sign up for his Twitter feed.
Rock Wool was known for its blowable insulation called rock wool or mineral wool. This type of insulation does not typically contain asbestos. But testing showed that some companies that produced rock wool added asbestos. Rock Wool was among the companies that did, leading to many claims of asbestos exposure.
Rock Wool likely used asbestos in their products until the s and possibly beyond. Lawsuits from found the company negligent for not putting warning labels on its products. Because of the financial burden from litigation, the company filed for bankruptcy in .
Today, the privately owned Rock Wool sells products under the Delta label. The company no longer produces residential blow-in insulation. It focuses on marine, construction, industrial and pipe insulation. Current products comply with asbestos regulations.
Rock Wool has a long history of supporting the construction industry. The company manufactured cement and other asbestos products for many years. However, trouble started for Rock Wool in when it faced asbestos lawsuits over Delta Maid, AF and One Shot cements.
Some asbestos products made or used by Rock Wool include:
Like many industries, manufacturing once relied on asbestos for the mineral&#;s durability and heat resistance. Rock Wool produced many different products for the construction industry. However, manufacturing and selling asbestos products risked exposing people to the mineral. Employees and others who came into contact with Rock Wool products risk developing an asbestos-related disease.
People in the construction and marine industries may have experienced exposure. Some jobs with higher exposure risk include construction workers and insulators. Also, secondhand exposure could happen when people who worked in these industries brought the dust home on their clothing and hair. People exposed to asbestos secondhand may develop mesothelioma or other illnesses.
If you want to learn more, please visit our website Waterproof Fire Resistance Wall Panel.