Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or

27 May.,2024

 

Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or

INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you interested in learning more about INvar Material? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!

Contact US

FIRST NAME

*


LAST NAME

*


*


MESSAGE

*


ADDITIONAL DETAILS

Thanks. We have received your request and will respond promptly.

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!

  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
Join Us!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving . By joining you are opting in to receive .

Posting Guidelines



Students Click Here

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Eng-Tips Posting Policies

Contact US

thread330- Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs
  • Forum

  • Search

  • FAQs

  • Links

  • MVPs

Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

dmalicky

(Mechanical)

(OP)

1 Oct 04 18:06

We need to cast some ~16" diameter pump housings with good dimensionally stability over a temp range 0 to 400 deg F.  To maintain required rotor tip clearances over that temp range, we need a material with a CTE of ~4.5*10^-6/deg F or lower (~8... /deg C).  

The only alloys I can find that meet that requirement are
- NiResist type 5, D5, and variants
- Cast Invar

Other characteristics:
- Reasonably good machinability.  I've read the NiResists are like mild steel, which is fine.  
- Good dimensional stability over a period of years.  I understand this is a problem for the machinable type of wrought Invar 36; I'm assuming it is also true for the cast version.  But what about NiResist 5/D5--are they susceptible for the same reasons since they have the same % Nickel?  Does annealing really solve the problem for either?
- Cost... I understand nickel has gone thru the roof the past year, so would like to avoid Invar or NiResist 5/D5 if possible.  But if they are the only option...
- Corrosion resistance not very important (equiv. to cast iron is fine).

Does anyone have any experience with these casting alloys?  Or can anyone recommend an alternative?

Thanks,
David

RE: Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

metengr

(Materials)

4 Oct 04 11:47


In reading your post, I guess I am somewhat confused about why you need such dimensional stability with a pump housing at a maximum operating temperature of 400 deg F. If the fluid you are going to pump is not corrosive, I would consider a cast steel pump housing. It can be stress relieved after fabrication to remove residual stresses.

As far as pump clearances, the radial and axial clearances can be accounted for in design between the impeller and pump housing seals and bushings. I see no reason to switch to materials that have low CTE, and could be difficult to obtain and repair (if the need arises)in the field.

RE: Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

strokersix

(Mechanical)

4 Oct 04 13:12

Be careful with the CTE for Invar.  It has a low CTE at room temperature but increased CTE at higher temperature.  I don't recall the exact numbers.

Want more information on Soft Magnetic Alloy? Feel free to contact us.

RE: Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

dmalicky

(Mechanical)

(OP)

4 Oct 04 13:27

Good question, Metengr, sorry, more details:  this is a solids pump--a rotary airlock feeder (pneumatic conveyance).  Airlocks need less than 0.010 tip clearances to minimize leakage, ideally around 0.004.  The blades need to be thin to maximize volumetric capacity, but this causes them to heat much faster than the housing at startup, and thus run into the housing (if the blades are not low CTE).  If the clearances are increased to prevent startup bind, or if low CTE blades are used, then after the housing heats up the clearances will also be unacceptable.  We can make the blades of Invar or NiResist, e.g., but still need a housing material with similar CTE.

This is an old problem in airlock design, and yes, there are a number of design "fixes"--pre-heated housings, conical bores with plunging rotor, and adjustable housing faces being the usual ones (and many others on the drawing board).  We're looking for a totally passive sol'n.  

Thanks,
David

RE: Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

arunmrao

(Materials)

5 Oct 04 13:00

dmalicky,
Your last post cleared some of the doubts I had in my mind about the need for such a close clearance( hence I was hesitating to respond). Well I have experience in manufacturing Invar castings and also Niresist D2 type(pump parts). But I have not had experience casting invar pump housing.

There are many issues related to this which if you desire we can discuss directly.

But please remember that you are dealing with a very expensive alloy as Ni is now very costly.

RE: Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

EdStainless

(Materials)

5 Oct 04 14:04
The chemistry control has to ge good and the heat treatment is critical.  The stabalization/stress relief has a large impact on the expansion rates.
The D5B probably has better mechanical properties than cast Invar.  It deffinitely has better corrosion and wear resistance.  It also does cast nicely.

I have cast all of the various Ni-Resist grades as parts for centrifugal pumps. D5B is nice to work with, if you can afford it.The chemistry control has to ge good and the heat treatment is critical. The stabalization/stress relief has a large impact on the expansion rates.The D5B probably has better mechanical properties than cast Invar. It deffinitely has better corrosion and wear resistance. It also does cast nicely.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Corrosion never sleeps, but it can be managed.
http://www.trenttube.com/Trent/tech_form.htm

RE: Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

dmalicky

(Mechanical)

(OP)

6 Oct 04 19:22

Thanks, everyone, for your tips.

EdStainless, I'm reading in the NIDI Pub (R. Covert et al., ) on Ni-Resists and it indicates the low chromium alloys machine easiest--e.g., 5 or D-5.  But, I don't know if the difference is really significant or how the other factors play in.  Any experience on how machining and casting compare between 5, D-5, D-5B?  Abrasion resistance is also a plus.  Machining is a big concern because we have to bore 16" diameter x 16" long.  

Sounds like we need a foundry well-experienced with these alloys.  Any recommendations for one in the midwest (we are in Kansas)?  

On cost, does anyone know what has been affecting the price of Nickel the past year?  I see it has gone from $4 to nearly $8 /lb and very volatile to boot.  

Thanks again,
David

RE: Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

EdStainless

(Materials)

7 Oct 04 09:59

Is the old Big4 foundry still in operation?  What about Tonkawa(OK)? I think the one in Pittsbugh KS is closed.  The others that I can think of in the region would not cast something that large.

I presume that you are casting a cylinder and then finish machining it.

As for cast, all metals prices have gone up at least 50%, some like Ni have doubled, and others are up a lot more than that (Mo has gone from $5 to $18).  I wouldn't surprise me  to see the raw material cost for D5B to be at least $5/lb without any casting costs.  The best foundary practices for these alloys would be to buy master alloy that is melted in bulk and tehn re-melt that mixing it with a controled amount of scrap and minor alloy additions.

The Cr in 5B is to balance the CTE. The machinability isn't bad, as long as your anneal is good. I would suggest annealing the castings, machining and then a stess relief/stabalization treatment at a subcritial temperature.Is the old Big4 foundry still in operation? What about Tonkawa(OK)? I think the one in Pittsbugh KS is closed. The others that I can think of in the region would not cast something that large.I presume that you are casting a cylinder and then finish machining it.As for cast, all metals prices have gone up at least 50%, some like Ni have doubled, and others are up a lot more than that (Mo has gone from $5 to $18). I wouldn't surprise me to see the raw material cost for D5B to be at least $5/lb without any casting costs. The best foundary practices for these alloys would be to buy master alloy that is melted in bulk and tehn re-melt that mixing it with a controled amount of scrap and minor alloy additions.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Corrosion never sleeps, but it can be managed.
http://www.trenttube.com/Trent/tech_form.htm

RE: Low CTE castings: NiResist, Invar, or ?

dmalicky

(Mechanical)

(OP)

13 Oct 04 18:08

Looks like EdStainless's $/lb estimate was pretty good, based on the first quote we've gotten so far.  Harris Industries in TX and Midwest Metals in MN are the closest ones I could find that would do these types of NiResist.  Anyone have experience with either of those?  Big4 is gone, Tonkawa has can't do our 400 lb weight.  

EdStainless, I wasn't sure what you meant by the Cr in 5B balancing the CTE: More stable with respect to temperature, closer match to something else...?    Yes, we are casting a cylinder then boring the ID.

Thanks again for everyone's help.  David

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.


Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Low Expansion Alloys

Used in applications where a hermetic seal between the metal, glass or ceramic is required, controlled expansion alloys are also used in vacuum tubes, optoelectronics, lightbulbs and other products where a degree of thermal expansion takes place (based on the specific temperature at any given time).

Here, Phillip Guthrie of Vulcan Metal Group addresses key questions that buyers should consider when selecting controlled expansion alloys.

Q: What are the primary controlled expansion alloys?

A: The primary controlled expansion alloys include Alloy 36, Alloy 42, Alloy 48, Alloy 52 and Alloy 54, each of which has its own thermal expansion coefficient and is used for specific applications. Alloy 36, for example, is most often used in precision laser equipment, instrumentation and electronic devices, where Alloy 42 gets the most use in thermostats and electrical switches. Alloy 48 is more widely used in electrical wiring or in industrial thermostats in environments that have to be heated up to 450 °C.

Q: What are some of the other commonly-used expansion alloys?

A: Alloy ASTM F-15 is comprised of nickel, cobalt and iron and used frequently in machining and deep drawing. This is one of the more popular controlled expansion options for hermetic sealing applications.

Invar 36 is a low-expansion alloy made of nickel and iron. It&#;s typically used in applications with minimum expansion requirements. Nickel 200/201/205/233 are all commercially pure, non-alloyed Nickel options that are used in the electronics industry. Some of the products that are made with this alloy include fuel cells, terminals, cathode shields and semiconductor supports.

Nickel 270 is another commercially-pure option used by the electronics industry for anode plates, passive cathodes and transistor enclosures (among other products).

Q: What other applications can expansion alloys be used for?

A: Other uses for expansion alloys include compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), auto lamps and additional electronic applications. In most cases, controlled expansion alloys are made through some combination of Kovar and iron nickel. Kovar is an iron-nickel-cobalt alloy with a coefficient of thermal expansion similar to that of hard (borosilicate) glass, making it especially suitable for uses which require a matched-expansion seal between metal and glass parts.

In addition, Kovar is frequently used in the electronics industry for metal parts bonded to hard glass envelopes for such devices as power tubes, x-ray tubes, etc., and other applications requiring glass-to-metal seals.

Q: What other factors should I consider when selecting controlled expansion alloys?

A: Procurement professionals and engineers should consider these key points:

1) What exactly do you want to seal?
2) What else do we know about the application in question?
3) What materials are being connected to each other?
4) What is the CTE of the material that we&#;re using?
5) Does the CTE align with that of the selected alloy?

The answers to these questions are important because the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) values must align to those of the alloy that you select. The CTE indicates the extent to which a material expands upon heating, and different substances expand by different amounts (i.e., exactly how much a specific material will expand or contract when it is heated or cooled).
It&#;s important to understand that over the course of small temperature ranges, the thermal expansion of uniform linear objects is proportional to temperature change.

Q: How else can I narrow down my selection?

A: Once you&#;ve made these calculations and determined whether the CTE of the material matches that of the alloy, you can narrow your choices down to a specific material or alloy that you need for that application. Note that while high-temperature metals like molybdenum and tantalum can also be used in areas where controlled expansion alloys are needed, for the most part you&#;ll be selecting among nickel iron and Kovar when making procurement decisions related to this metal category.

For more information, please visit Pure Metal.